Kyle Fahkrurazzi: How do we decide?

In many ways, the work of a critic is easy. We risk very little, yet enjoy a position over those who offer up their work to our judgments, but how do we decide? What are the bases of our judgments? If the learned judge in a trial based his judgment on cases, statute and other authorities, how do we, as a layman literally speaking, come upon into a judgment?

Does the judgment we gave according to ordinary norm and acceptable custom or does it due to our own belief, conscience or natural discretion? Later question in sequence need to be dealt with is that who make the custom, law and belief? Have you ever heard the phrase; ‘men-make-law’ constitutes that as long as it is men creation, it is seriously flawed as men are imperfect?

Rather to support, I as a law student, it’s our platform to belief that, law even less perfect may at least reduce hardship in our system of life. The sole answer is that no matter how difficult may the conflict is or how serious the crises are, we need to go back to the root of the genesis; where the divine rule came into force.

Now back to our main course, which hug should you consider of normal and acceptable?